Legal Opinion

J. F. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 26, 1998No. 97-1061PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARNER, Judge.

Appellant claims that he was denied a fair trial when the trial court became an active *252participant in his juvenile trial by requesting additional evidence and continuing the proceedings on its own motion to receive it. We agree that the trial judge impermissibly injected himself into the proceedings and reverse.

Appellant was charged with grand theft of an automobile and his case proceeded to an adjudicatory hearing. On cross-examination, appellant’s attorney asked one of the state’s witnesses, an investigating officer, if he had obtained any fingerprints off of the stolen…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. George Herman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  2. United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Nolberto Zuniga-Salinas, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  3. Harry H. Blumberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  4. Hunter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  5. Chastine v. BroomeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Sparks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. McFadden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Lyles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Evans v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API