Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Marathon v. Knickerbocker

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRhodes, J.

This action is upon a promissory note made to the plaintiff by M. J. Knickerbocker and D. Earl Barton. Both of the makers are dead, the said Barton having predeceased the said Knickerbocker. No representative of Barton’s estate has been appointed and it is alleged in the complaint and undisputed by the facts adduced upon this motion, that Barton’s estate is insolvent. Plaintiff having brought this action against the executors of said *468Knickerbocker, motion is now made in behalf of said defendant for an order joining as codefendant the representative of the estate of said Barton, upon the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Yorks v. PeckNew York Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lasky v. LissikNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Welch v. CampbellNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Bell v. Gaidula, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API