Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Judge & District Attorney General of the Thirteenth Judicial District

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided March 3, 1976No. C-75-50-EPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

McRAE, District Judge.

In June 1975 James G. Palmer, acting pro se, filed this suit, titled “Motion— Writ of Mandamus,” seeking to have a 1959 Gibson County Tennessee indictment quashed and a renewed 1975 detainer filed against petitioner in Illinois ordered withdrawn. The petitioner claims that he has been denied his rights to a speedy trial by the appropriate officials of Tennessee.

This Court ordered this suit to be treated as a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Subsequently the Court denied the State’s Motion to Dismiss, ordered the State to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Latzer v. AbramsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
  2. (DP) Letner v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  3. Burrow v. HoskinDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1990
  4. Palmer v. JUDGE AND DIST. ATTY. GEN.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API