Legal Opinion
Zugnoni v. Travelers Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 31, 1992PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In this case, there were uncontroverted facts supporting plaintiffs’ excuse that no notice was given because they did not anticipate that a claim would be covered under the policy. The incident underlying the claim was merely an altercation between students on a school bus, and plaintiffs had an understanding with the parents of the injured boy that they would not assert a claim. Those parties treated the incident as an intentional act for which there was no coverage under the policy. Indeed, the parents of the injured student asserted a claim only against the school district, which served…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Merchants Mutual Insurance v. HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Merchants Mutual Insurance v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Clute v. Harder Silo Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Insurance Co. of North America v. ShoreNew York Supreme Court · 1978
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Travelers Insurance & DeLoshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- E.T. Nutrition Inc. v. Central Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Can-Am Roofing, Inc. v. American States InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Kim v. MaherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- BN PARTNERS ASSOCIATES, LL v. SELECTIVE WAY INSURANCE CO.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.