Legal Opinion

Randall v. Paine-Nichols Abstract Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 6, 1951No. 34310PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, brought this action seeking to recover damages for alleged error in compiling an abstract. The amended petition alleged the defendant abstract company had been employed to compile an abstract covering plaintiffs’ farm; that it was compiled and delivered to the prospective purchasers without being seen by plaintiffs; that the abstracter negligently failed to show the property was burdened by a flow-age easement in favor of the United States; that subsequent to execution of their warranty deed their grantees sued plaintiffs for breach of warranty, and recovered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sackett v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. PerinoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Sharp v. Pawhuska Ice Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. First State Bank of Addington v. LatimerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Black v. WickettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Williams v. PolgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Ryan v. KanneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  3. Mayhew, Huston v. DEISTERIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Craft v. BatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  5. Tipton County Abstract Co. v. Heritage Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API