State v. Hawkins
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN, Judge.
Defendant contends the trial court erred in sentencing him as an habitual felon because of an alleged defect in the habitual felon indictment. We agree.
Defendant was indicted on (1) four counts of felonious breaking and entering, (2) three counts of felonious larceny, and (3) one count of being an habitual felon. The habitual felon indictment properly alleged that defendant had been convicted of three previous counts of felonious breaking or entering, but failed to allege defendant was currently charged with either felonious breaking or entering or felonious larceny. The cases…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. CamelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. McGahaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. JamersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. CheekSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.