Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Tom Murphy Construction Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 30, 1982No. 81-5089PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:

This appeal, in a diversity action, requires application of Fla.Stat. § 725.01 to an indemnification contract which required written notice for termination. Finding genuine issues of fact to be litigated, we reverse and remand.

*881FACTS

Tom Murphy and Dale Stringer were equal shareholders in Tom Murphy Construction Company, Inc. (Murphy Construction), a Florida corporation primarily engaged in the field of municipal construction. In order to successfully bid on public construction projects, a bid payment and performance bond was required to be submitted along with the bid.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Simplex Time Recorder Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Professional Insurance Corporation v. CahillSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. Moses v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. West River Equipment Co. v. Holzworth Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Dicker v. Lomas & Nettleton Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fidelity And Deposit Company Of Maryland v. Tom Murphy Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API