Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Tom Murphy Construction Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:
This appeal, in a diversity action, requires application of Fla.Stat. § 725.01 to an indemnification contract which required written notice for termination. Finding genuine issues of fact to be litigated, we reverse and remand.
*881FACTS
Tom Murphy and Dale Stringer were equal shareholders in Tom Murphy Construction Company, Inc. (Murphy Construction), a Florida corporation primarily engaged in the field of municipal construction. In order to successfully bid on public construction projects, a bid payment and performance bond was required to be submitted along with the bid.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Watkins v. Simplex Time Recorder Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Professional Insurance Corporation v. CahillSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Moses v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- West River Equipment Co. v. Holzworth Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1959
- Dicker v. Lomas & Nettleton Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fidelity And Deposit Company Of Maryland v. Tom Murphy Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982