Union Bank of Louisiana v. Bradford

This suit was instituted by the Union Bank. Afterwards Henry Marston, having purchased the assets of the branch at Clinton and having been subrogated to the rights of the bank, was substituted for the original plaintiff.

This action is to recover a balance due on a bond executed in favor of the bank by Foster Bradford and his wife, Mary, on the 30th December, 1834, for eleven hundred dollars, payable in twelve months from that time, and secured by mortgage.

The suit is carried on against Foster Bradford, who plead the prescription of ten years. This plea was sustained and plaintiff has appealed.