Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. David Rico

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 28, 2015No. 14-50141, 14-50280Unpublished

1ConcurrenceReinhardt, Circuit Judge

I concur in the memorandum disposition. I would add that I do not construe our disposition as a flat ruling that defense counsel may never issue a narrow subpoena to an attorney regarding what occurred at a conference between the attorney’s client and the prosecuting authority, as it may well be critical to whether there has been a violation of Brady or Napue. Whether defense counsel is always required to rely only on the notes taken by persons on the prosecution’s side is a question that should be decided, if at all, in a case with a fuller record. There are of course some exceptions to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. In Re: Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  3. Swidler & Berlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API