Legal Opinion
Pasternak v. Dow Kim
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 22, 2011No. 10 Civ. 5045(LTS)(JLC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JAMES L. COTT, United States Magistrate Judge.
By letter dated August 4, 2011, Plaintiff Michael L. Pasternak has requested permission to move pursuant to Rule 37(a)(3)(B)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to compel Defendant Dow Kim to answer questions that were posed during the course of his continued deposition on July 7, 2011 related to Kim’s financial status, and to compel the production of financial statements, statements of net worth, loan applications, and bank and brokerage account statements for the period 2008 to the present (“Kim’s financial…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rupert v. SellersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Hoeffner v. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Kelly v. Defoe Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Mayline Enterprises, Inc. v. Milea Truck Sales Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
3Cited by4 opinions
- Corradino v. Liquidnet Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Enechi v. The City Of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Moore v. Fitzpatrick et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Stidhum v. 161-10 Hillside Auto Ave, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022