Legal Opinion

Hamil v. Whitlow Steel Co. Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 5, 1980No. B2293PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COULSON, Justice.

This is a suit on a promissory note executed by Union Marketing Consultants, Inc., appellant, A. B. Hamil (Hamil), and others, payable to the order of appellee, Whitlow Steel Company, Inc. (Whitlow Steel). When the note was not paid, Whit-low Steel sued the makers. Hamil’s answer claimed a lack of consideration for his execution of the note and fraud in the inducement of his execution. After a trial to the court judgment was entered that Whitlow Steel recover on the note from all the makers, jointly and severally. Only Hamil has appealed. We affirm.

Appellant Hamil was one of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Texas Export Development Corporation v. SchlederCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Lewis v. Ada Employees Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. Borrett v. Frank Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Piland, James Earl v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  2. Piland, James Earl v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API