Legal Opinion

Tortorella v. A.C. & S., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered on or about June 17, 2005, which denied the motion for summary judgment by defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (Con Edison), unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Con Edison dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against it.

The claim against Con Edison is based on the alleged exposure of the decedent, an electrician, to asbestos dust while he was installing emergency generators and lighting at a Con Edison…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Comes v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Rizzuto v. L.A. Wenger Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Murphy v. Columbia UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Mazzocchi v. International Business Machines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of New York Asbestos Litig.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. Matter of New York Asbestos Litig.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. Matter of New York Asbestos Litig.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API