Legal Opinion
Casey v. Riedel
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided March 29, 2002No. 4:00-cv-20334PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREMER, United States Magistrate Judge.
The Court has before it Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Clerk’s No. 29). Plaintiff claims Defendants retaliated against her for asserting her civil rights, thus violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.2000e— 2000e-17 (1994 & West Supp.1998), and the Iowa Civil Rights Act (ICRA), Iowa Code chapter 216 (1998). Plaintiff further claims that Defendants violated state law when they wrongfully discharged her, through constructive discharge, in violation of public policy. Plaintiff seeks compensatory and punitive…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dare v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
- Wilson v. City of Des MoinesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2004
- Cole v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2006
- Muhammed v. City of St. LouisDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020