Legal Opinion
Saggau v. Young
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 25, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 4124-55PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGARRAGHY, District Judge.
This case came on for hearing on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The material facts are as follows :
Plaintiff is the Postmaster in Ceylon, Minnesota. On October 12, 1954, he was notified by letter from a Post Office Inspector that his separation from the position of Postmaster had,been proposed on the ground of inefficiency. Another letter bearing the same date listed 29 irregularities or violations of postal laws and regulations. On October 18, 1954, plaintiff replied to the letter of October 12 and listed those irregularities which had been corrected and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bailey v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Bailey v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Carter v. ForrestalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Powell v. Brannan, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Charles S. Thomas, Secretary of the Department of the Navy v. William E. WardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Thomas A. McDonough v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Henry A. C. Saggau v. Philip Young, Commissioners of Civil Service, and Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Murphy v. KelleyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1966