Ford v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtHerlihy, J.
The claim is based upon the acts of the State trooper in executing the warrant which, as alleged, was void on its face for the reason that it 1 ‘ failed to state any acts constituting a crime ”.
The claim set forth the following pertinent facts: In May, 1961 claimant, as indorser, cashed a check at Slim’s Market in the Town of Grlenville. The check was returned as it was drawn against a fictitious account. A complaint was initiated by a collection agent with a Justic of the Peace who, based upon the check before him, prepared an information, which was signed by the collection agent, charging…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. GroganNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- People v. . MarendiNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Warner v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Snead v. . BonnoilNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Nastasi v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Boose v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Barr v. County of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. SingletonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- People v. DylaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- State v. ArchuletaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.