Legal Opinion

Cardem, Inc. v. Marketron International, Ltd.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 31, 2001No. 2 — 99—1451PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Malley

Defendant, Theodore A. Koyzis (Koyzis), appeals from a summary judgment order that held that he was personally liable for a promissory note because the corporation on whose behalf he purportedly signed the note was dissolved at the time he signed it. Koyzis contends there are two reasons why he is not personally liable for the note: (1) the conduct that gave rise to the note occurred prior to the dissolution of the corporation; and (2) the reinstatement of the corporation ratified the debt as a corporate obligation. We affirm.

Plaintiff, Cardem, Inc. (Cardem), filed a multicount complaint…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Busch v. Graphic Color Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Mid-American Elevator Co. v. Norcon, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  3. Estate of Plepel v. Industrial Metals, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Brooklyn Bagel Boys, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Steve's Equipment Service, Inc. v. RiebrandtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pannell v. ShannonKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Gonnella Baking Co. v. Clara's Pasta Di Casa, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. Puleo v. TopelAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  4. Forsythe-Fournier v. IsaacsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. Forsythe-Fournier v. IsaacsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API