Parlapiano v. District Court in & for Tenth Jud. Dist.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Groves
A defendant was indicted for felonious conspiracy to possess a narcotic drug. The respondent judge entered an order that, not later than three days prior to trial, the People should furnish for inspection by defendant’s counsel a transcript of the testimony before the grand jury of any witnesses who would be called to testify at trial. The district attorney filed a petition here for a writ of prohibition to prevent such disclosure under the order. We issued a rule to show cause why the relief prayed by the district attorney should not be granted.
We discharge the rule.
The order referred to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. Maurice RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- ANTROBUS v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- People v. District Court in & for County of LarimerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- Granbery v. DISTRICT CT. IN & FOR CITY & CTY. OF DENVERSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- People v. RoblasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.