Legal Opinion

Parlapiano v. District Court in & for Tenth Jud. Dist.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 20, 1971No. 25345PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Groves

A defendant was indicted for felonious conspiracy to possess a narcotic drug. The respondent judge entered an order that, not later than three days prior to trial, the People should furnish for inspection by defendant’s counsel a transcript of the testimony before the grand jury of any witnesses who would be called to testify at trial. The district attorney filed a petition here for a writ of prohibition to prevent such disclosure under the order. We issued a rule to show cause why the relief prayed by the district attorney should not be granted.

We discharge the rule.

The order referred to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. United States v. Maurice RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  5. ANTROBUS v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  2. People v. District Court in & for County of LarimerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  3. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  4. Granbery v. DISTRICT CT. IN & FOR CITY & CTY. OF DENVERSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  5. People v. RoblasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API