Legal Opinion

Hamm v. City of San Francisco

United States Circuit Court

Decided May 28, 1883PublishedCited by 7 opinions

At Law.

1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.

The contest in this case arises out of a defect in a conveyance from Henry Gierke to the town of San Francisco, executed in 1850; but the day and month are left blank. It was acknowledged, however, April 8, 1850, and recorded on the following day. Gierke, before the land was surveyed into lots, had received a grant of two 50-vara lots in 1848; or rather an unsurveyed lot 50 by 100 varas, equal to two 50-vara lots. Upon extending the surveys, subsequently, by direction of the ayuntamiento, six 50-vara lots *120were set apart as a public square, since known as Union square, which embraced the lot…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. LuningSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Mulford v. Le FrancCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Steinbach v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Reamer v. NesmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Nat. Bank v. Benedict Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  2. Chicago G. W. Ry. Co. v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  3. United States v. Big Bend Transit Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1941
  4. Chidester v. City of NewarkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1945
  5. Pratt v. California Min. Co.United States Circuit Court · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API