Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Thrall

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 15, 1856PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal prom the court op chancery. A statement of tbe facts, the object of the bill, and the decree of the court of chancery, will be found in the opinion of the supreme court, which after argument by

1Opinion of the Court

was delivered, at the circuit session in June, by

Isham, J.

The general object of this bill in chancery is to pbfain relief from the payment of a promissory note, executed toi *383Aaron Johnson or bearer, on the 30th of March 1840, and made payable on the first of April, 1843. The note is now sued at law in the name of Mr. Thrall. The chancellor decreed a perpetual injunction upon the further prosecution of the suit on that note. The case is now brought before this court by appeal, and the question arises whether, upon the facts existing in the case, that decree was properly made.

It is stated in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Abbott v. AllenNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
  2. Mills v. CatlinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
  3. Gouverneur v. ElmendorfNew York Court of Chancery · 1821
  4. Robinson v. LymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1833
  5. De Mott v. StarkeyNew York Court of Chancery · 1848

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bruch v. Benedict Barnes Bros.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Armstrong v. NobleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1883
  3. Cummings v. DearbornSupreme Court of Vermont · 1884
  4. Fairbanks v. HarveySupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
  5. Rogers v. ChaseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API