Legal Opinion
Radhakrishnan v. Gampel
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided March 1, 2024No. 2:20-cv-00176Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 United States ex rel. Radhakrishnan, et al., No. CV-20-00176-PHX-GMS LEAD CASE 10 Plaintiffs, Consolidated with: 11 v. No. CV-21-00010-PHX-SPL No. CV-21-01206-PHX-GMS 12 Yury Gampel, et al., ORDER 13 Defendants. 14 United States ex rel. Terry, et al., 15 Plaintiffs, 16 v. 17 Modern Vascular of Glendale LLC, et al., 18 Defendants. 19 20 United States ex rel. Katherine Diggins, et al., 21 Plaintiffs, 22 v. 23 Modern Vascular LLC, et al., 24 Defendants. 25 26 27 28 1 Pending before the Court are: (1) Defendant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ebeid Ex Rel. United States v. LungwitzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States Ex Rel. Greenfield v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Lennard L. MeadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- The Hanlester Network v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. PereiraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.