Legal Opinion
Perinton Associates v. Heicklen Farms, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 1978PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WlLMER J. PATLOW, J.
This motion stems from two actions involving a disputed lease agreement. The property, which is the subject matter of the lease, is a shopping center located in Monroe County.
Plaintiffs in the first action (hereinafter referred to as "plaintiffs”) sued defendants in New York County. Defendants *432in the first action (hereinafter referred to as "defendants”) subsequently commenced suit against plaintiffs in Monroe County. Plaintiffs are from New York County, defendants from Monroe County. Issue was joined and a demand for change of place of trial was served…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kiamesha Concord, Inc. v. GreenmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Matco Electric Co. v. Beacon Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Smith v. Witteman Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Velasquez v. Pine Grove Resort Ranch, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1974
3Cited by1 opinion
- Perinton Associates v. Heicklen Farms, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979