Legal Opinion

Dawnwood Properties/78 v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 13, 2002No. 95-569 CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HEWITT, Judge.

The court has before it Defendant’s Supplemental Motion to Dismiss and/or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment (Def.’s Supp.Mot.) and Plaintiffs Supplemental Reply Brief to Defendant’s Supplemental Motion to Dismiss and/or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment (Pl.’s Resp.). In an order dated May 29, 2002, the court granted defendant’s request to file supplemental briefing to the original pending briefing that was filed in 1995 and 1998. This order addresses that supplemental briefing as well as the original pending motions.1

Defendant seeks dismissal on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Marin Motor Oil, Inc. v. MichaelsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  5. Phoenix W. Wheeler, Individually and on Behalf of a Class of Persons Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boston Edison Co. v. StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Ironclad/EEI v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API