Legal Opinion

Ratliff v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 23, 2001No. 49A02-0010-CR-677PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Defendant, Jason Ratliff (Ratliff), brings this interlocutory appeal following the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress the evidence obtained as a result of his arrest for dealing in a schedule IV controlled substance, a Class C felony, Ind.Code § 35-48-4-3; possession of a controlled substance, a Class D felony, Ind.Code § 35-48-4-7; and resisting law enforcement, a Class D felony, Ind.Code § 35-44-3-3.

We reverse and remand for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

ISSUE

On appeal, Ratliff raises one issue for our…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. California v. CarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ammons v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Ratliff v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Ratliff v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API