Legal Opinion

Personal Restraint Petition Of Martin Pang

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 17, 2017No. 73994-8-IPublished

1Per curiam

¶1 Following Martin Pang’s 1998 convictions for four counts of manslaughter, the court imposed a sentence that included discretionary legal financial obligations (LFOs). In 2015, Pang filed a motion in superior court for an “individualized inquiry” into his ability to pay his discretionary LFOs. Citing RCW 10.01.160(3) and State v. Blazina, Pang argued that he never received the requisite inquiry into his ability to pay and that the court should perform that inquiry and waive his discretionary financial obligations. The court ruled the motion was untimely and transferred it to this court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BlazinaWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of FlippoWashington Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API