Legal Opinion
Miller v. Walters
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 9, 2014PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Eileen Bransten, J.
In this action, plaintiffs Andy Miller and ASM Sports (ASM) bring tortious interference, unjust enrichment, unfair competí*419tion, and prima facie tort claims against rival sports management firms and their principals, stemming from defendants’ purported “theft” of plaintiffs’ client, Larry Sanders.1 Defendants now seek dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7). For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action is granted.
I. Background2
Plaintiff Andy Miller is the founder and president of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Mandarin Trading Ltd. v. WildensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- 511 West 232nd Owners Corp. v. Jennifer Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Carvel Corp. v. NoonanNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- RBG Management Corp. v. Village Super Market, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023