Trustees of the Presbytery v. Westminster Presbyterian Church of West Twenty-Third Street
New York Court of Appeals
Motion in each case to recall and amend remittitur. (See 222 N. Y. 305, 642.)
1Per curiam
We see no reason for recalling the remittitur in either of the above cases. Our decisions as therein set forth are plain and the disagreement of the parties in respect of the judgments to be entered thereon seems principally to arise from the circumstance that each one is in some particular dissatisfied with the decisions which we have made and desires to make a re-argument.
First. In the first above-entitled action, the ejectment action so denominated, our decision that the judgment of the Appellate Division be modified and as so modified affirmed “ without costs ” under perfectly…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Sweeney v. MurphyNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- A. A. Levy Co. v. Columbia Overseas Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- In re the Estate of JacobsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936