Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Heert

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided November 15, 1895Published

Action by George W. Perkins against Henry H. Heert and others. Plaintiff moves for an extra allowance.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

This is a motion for an extra allowance under section 3253 of the Code, on the ground that the case was a difficult and extraordinary one. The action was to restrain defendants from using a certain trade-mark, and for an accounting and the payment of profits arising from defendants’ use of such trade-mark. The trial resulted in plaintiff’s favor, and judgment was rendered restraining defendants from using such trade-mark, and granting an accounting. The referee appointed to take such accounting found the sum due from defendants to be $75. The plaintiff claims an extra allowance, based, not on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Munro v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Sheldon v. AllertonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1849

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API