Legal Opinion

Churchill v. State

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 1, 1975No. 47,518PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal in a postconviotion proceeding under K. S. A. 60-1507.

Petitioner was convicted of rape and sentenced under the habitual criminal statute. No direct appeal was taken from the conviction and sentence.

The sentence was challenged by a pro se motion. The motion alleged: (1) The habitual criminal act as applied denied due process and equal protection of the laws; (2) The habitual criminal act arbitrarily and unreasonably imposed additional involuntary servitude; (3) The title to' Chapter 124, 1970 Session Laws of Kansas was invalid; (4) Counsel did not provide adequate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Addington v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Gladen v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  3. State v. TroySupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  5. State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Ortega-CadelanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. State v. KramerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  3. Barnes v. BaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  4. State v. HornbeakSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  5. State v. LevierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API