Churchill v. State
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Per curiam
This is an appeal in a postconviotion proceeding under K. S. A. 60-1507.
Petitioner was convicted of rape and sentenced under the habitual criminal statute. No direct appeal was taken from the conviction and sentence.
The sentence was challenged by a pro se motion. The motion alleged: (1) The habitual criminal act as applied denied due process and equal protection of the laws; (2) The habitual criminal act arbitrarily and unreasonably imposed additional involuntary servitude; (3) The title to' Chapter 124, 1970 Session Laws of Kansas was invalid; (4) Counsel did not provide adequate…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Addington v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Gladen v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- State v. TroySupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Young v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Ortega-CadelanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- State v. KramerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Barnes v. BaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- State v. HornbeakSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- State v. LevierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.