McCague Investment Co. v. Metropolitan Water District
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: Charles Leslie, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtCornish, J.
The first question presented is whether appeal lies from the equalization and assessment of special taxes by a metropolitan water district, on lots abutting on its water mains. The trial court found that it did not.
Such districts are a separate body corporate, created by law, and may include (in this case did include) more than one municipality. They come under the provisions of the general law relating to water main extension or enlargement by districts. Rev. St. 1913, secs. 5263-5269. Section 5267, besides providing for assessment against abutting property and the manner of payment of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sioux City & Pacific Railroad v. Washington CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
- Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Dodge County v. AcomNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
- Munk v. FrinkNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Wead v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Heckman v. MarchioNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Roberts v. City of MitchellNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
- Loup River Public Power District v. Platte CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
- Loup River Public Power District v. Platte CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
- Mid-Continent Airlines, Inc. v. Nebraska State Board of Equalization & AssessmentDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.