Legal Opinion

Solowye v. Hazlett

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 15, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff from an order granting the defendant’s motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evideuce, without any" terms whatsoever, and with ten dollars costs to the defendant against the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtSchuchman, J.

The complaint alleges a cause of action for goods sold and delivered°to the defendant at the value of $154.20. The answer is a general denial. At the trial the defendant admitted that the goods were delivered to him, and that he received them; but he claimed that he was only the superintendent; of the buildings upon which the goods were used, and that he purchased the same as the agent of the owner of the buildings, one William S. Long. The plaintiff, however, testified that he sold and delivered those goods to the defendant; that the defendant promised to him, when the bill was presented, to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Keister v. RankinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Bantheon v. MeierNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Markert v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  2. Flock v. KaufmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API