Ex Parte Bryant
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson
The sole question presented in this original Habeas Corpus proceeding is whether a county court has jurisdiction to enjoin the operation of a bawdy house as a nuisance under Art. 4666, V.A.C.S.
The State contends that under Art. 5, sec. 22, Texas Constitution, the legislature controls the jurisdiction of county courts and that in Art. 4656, V.A.C.S. the legislature has provided that injunctions may be tried in either the district or the county court “according as the amount or matter in controversy comes within the jurisdiction of either of said courts.” Therefore, the State contends, that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- De Witt County v. WischkemperTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Dean v. State Ex Rel. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Johnson v. HanscomTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Dulaney v. WalshTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Shaffer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
3Cited by6 opinions
- Super X Drugs of Texas, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Guerra v. WeatherlyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- In Re Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- City of Lubbock v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Martin v. Victoria Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.