Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Amaker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 30, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

The merits of the case turn upon the question of possession under color of title. There was ample evidence to support and justify the verdict, and therefore the finding of the jury is conclusive. The plaintiffs assail the charge of the court with respect to tacking and rely upon the case of Morrison v. Craven, 120 N. C., 327, 26 S. E., 940. However, this case is not applicable to the facts disclosed by the record. Vanderbilt v. Chapman, 172 N. C., 809, 90 S. E., 993.

No error.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vanderbilt v. . ChapmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Morrison v. . CravenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lofton v. . BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946