Legal Opinion

In the Interest of C.L.L.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 12, 1989No. 55785PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Judge.

R.P.L., Sr. (father), appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights to his daughter, C.L.L., bom September 5, 1981, and his two sons R.P.L., Jr., bom September 27, 1982, and R.A.L., bom September 28,1984 under Section 211.447.2(2), RSMo. (1986). The mother, a party below, consented to termination *477of her parental rights and is therefore not a party on appeal. We affirm.

Father does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. Indeed, the record on appeal is replete with substantial evidence to support the judgment of the trial court Father placed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Collins v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. State v. OwensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Marriage of Schreier v. SchreierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Barlett Ex Rel. Barlett v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Nance v. NanceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. In the Interest D.L.W.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. James v. JamesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Juvenile Officer v. W.M.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API