Legal Opinion

Rohthstein v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 26, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action of tort brought by the plaintiff, as administrator of the estate of George Rohth-stein, to recover damages for the death of his intestate, who was instantly killed on September 18, 1930, at a grade crossing in Newbury, in this Commonwealth, when an automobile truck driven by the intestate and a passenger train of the defendant were in collision.

The plaintiff's amended declaration contains two counts. Count 1 is brought under G. L. c. 160, §§ 138, 232, and alleges in substance that the defendant by its servants neglected to ring a bell or sound a steam whistle upon the engine…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Duggan v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. Jones v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Klegerman v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Anthony v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Creeley v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Papageorge v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API