Harvey v. State
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Chambers. Tried below before the Hon. William Chambers. There is no occasion for a statement of the facts.
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
The appellant was entitled to a special venire; he was also entitled to a copy of the indictment, and a copy of the names of the jurors summoned, and it was error in the court to rule him to trial, without a strict compliance with the law in this behalf.
It was further error in the court to refuse the appellant the right to cross-examine a witness for the State, who had left the stand, but whom it was proposed to recall for the purpose of laying the foundation for evidence proving that she had made contradictory statements out of court.
*366A party does'not make a witness Ms own, if he merely…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Garner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
- State v. VansantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Casey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Fuller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.