Legal Opinion

City of Wharton v. Stavena

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided May 4, 1989No. 13-88-121-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DORSEY, Justice.

Appellant, the City of Wharton, originally filed a petition to condemn certain lands owned by appellees, Walter and Nelga Stavena. After the special commissioners awarded damages, appellant moved to dismiss the proceedings. Following a hearing, the trial court granted the motion and rendered a judgment against appellant for appellees’ attorney’s fees, appraisal fees, and expenses. Appellant now complains of the court’s judgment by six points of error. We affirm.

At issue is whether the landowner, Stavena, is entitled to attorney’s fees as a result of appellant’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Houston v. Blackbird, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. Ottis, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
  2. State v. Tamminga, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1996
  3. Board of Regents of the University of Houston System v. FKM Partnership, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  4. Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Weber, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  5. Urban Wilderness, S.A. v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API