Finegan v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WILLHITE, J. *
Introduction
When an employer unlawfully fires or discriminates against an employee, recent federal and California cases hold that the employer may not necessarily escape liability through so-called after-acquired evidence of other wrongdoing by the employee showing he would have been fired for other reasons. At issue here is whether that rule bars expert medical testimony offered to rebut the plaintiff’s claim that he was qualified to perform his job, which is an essential element of a cause of action for disability discrimination. As set forth below, we hold such…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Albertson's, Inc. v. KirkingburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Donna Heilweil v. Mount Sinai HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Bonnie Mantolete v. William G. Bolger, in His Capacity as Postmaster General, United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- King v. United Parcel Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Woods v. FOX BROADCASTING SUB., INC.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Jadwin v. County of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Diaz v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Davis v. Los Angeles Unified School District Personnel CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.