District Township of Jasper v. District Township of Sheridan
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Carroll District Court. Action to recover certain taxes paid by tlie treasurer of Oar-roll county to the defendant. The taxes were collected upon certain railroad lands in said county, and they were paid to the defendant, because the lands at the time the taxes were levied were within the defendant district township.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Carroll District Court. Action to recover certain taxes paid by tlie treasurer of Oar-roll county to the defendant. The taxes were collected upon certain railroad lands in said county, and they were paid to the defendant, because the lands at the time the taxes were levied were within the defendant district township. The taxes, however, were for the years 1866 and 1867, and during those years and until March, 1868, the township within which the lands were situated was embraced in the district township of Jasper. That district then embraced the north half of Oarroll county. In the…
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
i school aistriet: division of: taxation, The basis upon which the equitable division was made was that the plaintiff should draw the “fund due,” etc. It is claimed by the defendant that the , ,. , lT 7 , taxes m question were not then wue, and so not covered by the agreement. The question presented is as to the meaning of the word due as used by the parties. It is claimed by the defendant that a fund is due when the time arrives in which payment is enforceable. And it must be admitted that this is the ordinary meaning of the word. But, while that is so, there is certainly another meaning…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Tally v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Ryan & Walsh v. Douglas CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Town of Greenfield v. Village of West MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Town of Cassian v. Town of NokomisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Townsend v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.