Legal Opinion
Claim of Van Dam v. New Paltz Central School District
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 20, 2007PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMugglin, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed September 26, 2006, which denied claimant’s application for workers’ compensation benefits.
In order to establish that her illnesses were causally related to her work as a teacher for the New Faltz Central School District, claimant offered the testimony and related documents of her physician, a licensed and board-certified internist. The Workers’ Compensation Law Judge concluded that this evidence could not be considered since claimant’s physician was not authorized to render medical care under the Workers’ Compensa*1195tion Law and,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Szold v. Outlet Embroidery Supply Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Claim of Bowman v. J & J Log & Lumber Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Selleck v. Lane Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of Habif v. New York State Workers' Compensation Bd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Cohen v. New York State Workers' Compensation BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Cohen v. New York State Workers' Compensation BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re the Claim of CamposAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Matter of Wagner v. Bobley Publ. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.