People v. Laeke
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge CASEBOLT.
The issue in this criminal case is whether Abel Gebre Laeke, a mentally ill defendant, has a right to a jury trial under Colorado's insanity statute, section 16-8-105.5(2), C.R.S. 2009, even after the prosecution concedes his insanity, because he objected to his counsel's entry of a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI), contended he did not commit the underlying charge, and did not personally waive a jury trial. Because we conclude that he does, we reverse the trial court's judgment finding him insane and committing him to the Colorado State Mental Hospital…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- People v. CurtisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. MontoyaColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. WalkerColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- Kevin Dale Best v. Karin ArnoldDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
- Michael Salvo, App. V. Washington Criminal Justice Training Commission, Et Ano, Resp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2026
- Tonner v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025