Legal Opinion

St. Louis & Westervelt, Inc. v. Giulini

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 18, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*100OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Judgment dated September 30,1996 affirmed, with $25 costs.

Under the authority of Urban Ct. Reporting v Davis (158 AD2d 401, 402 [1st Dept]), “an attorney who, on his client’s behalf, obtains goods or services in connection with litigation should be held personally liable unless the attorney expressly disclaims such responsibility”. No such disclaimer was proven in this case (see, S&S Reporting Co. v Grossman, NYLJ, Sept. 18, 1995, at 27, col 2 [App Term, 1st Dept]). Indeed, in his deposition testimony read into evidence, defendant attorney acknowledged his responsibility…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cobble Hill Nursing Home, Inc. v. Henry & Warren Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Urban Court Reporting, Inc. v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smart Document Solutions, LLC v. MillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Sullivan v. Greene & Zinner, P. C.White Plains City Court · 1999
  3. Smart Document Solutions, LLC v. Michael B. MillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API