Legal Opinion

Williams v. General Motors Corporation

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 12, 1973No. 7318SC561PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Plaintiff’s sole assignment of error is the granting of the motions for directed verdict. The test of whether the court may grant a motion for directed verdict in favor of a defendant at the close of plaintiff’s evidence is whether, as a matter of law, the evidence is insufficient to justify a verdict for the plaintiff when all the evidence is considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Kelly v. Harvester Co., 278 N.C. 153, 179 S.E. 2d 396 (1971).

Plaintiff’s evidence tended to show: She had borrowed the automobile in question from one James Milton for a trip to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Cooper v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. Boggs v. PlybonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  4. Trimyer v. Norfolk Tallow Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  5. Charnock v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Kinlaw v. Long Mfg. N.C., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Crews v. W. A. Brown & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Driver v. Burlington Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Commercial Truck & Trailer Sales, Inc. v. McCampbellTennessee Supreme Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API