Legal Opinion

People v. Campbell

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided April 7, 1972PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEugene R. Canudo, J.

Much confusion is generated in our criminal proceedings, all too often, by efforts to relate the production or nonproduction of stolen property to the best evidence rule. The issue in such eases is whether a larceny can *809be proved without bringing in either the physical object which was stolen or some writing that shows who owns it. To put it another way, the point is often made that the stolen object or some tag or memorandum attached or affixed to it constitutes the best evidence of the larceny.

No New York decision has been found on this precise issue. This is the reason for the explanation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kain v. . LarkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Williams v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Carroll v. Gimbel Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  4. People v. CraigAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  5. State v. CampbellUtah Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stephans v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  2. People v. Fletcher Gravel Co., New York County Courts1975
  3. People v. FonvilleCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1973
  4. People v. MarshallAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1978
  5. People v. ScottCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API