Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Village of Newburg v. Town of Trenton

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 26, 2009No. 2008AP2997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C.J.

¶ 1. The Wisconsin legislature generally requires an incorporated municipality to act within its own territorial boundaries. But our legislature has recognized that a municipality may need to act outside its boundaries to plan for its future expansion and physical development. So the legislature allows a municipality to temporarily enact a moratorium that prohibits unincorporated towns from changing the zoning of land next to the municipality's boundaries. The moratorium gives the municipality time to work with each unincorporated town affected to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan on how…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Town of Eagle v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  2. City of Waukesha v. TOWN BOARD OF WAUKESHACourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  3. Hunt Club Condominiums, Inc. v. Mac-Gray Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  4. State v. ThumsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fleischman v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Propp v. Sauk County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API