Legal Opinion
Levine v. Parks Chevrolet, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided July 16, 1985No. 8418DC1212PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
Defendant Parks Chevrolet contends that the court erred in denying its motions for directed verdict at the close of plaintiffs evidence and at the close of all the evidence and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict because there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that defendant Parks knew the odometer reading was incorrect and that it acted with intent to defraud. We disagree.
This action was tried under G.S. 20-347 & 48 and 15 U.S.C. 1988-89. G.S. 20-347 provides in pertinent part:(a) In connection with the transfer of a motor vehicle, the transferor shall…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jenny Nieto, A/K/A Jenny Nieto Soto v. Bill Pence, Individually and D/B/A Import Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Tusa v. Omaha Auto Auction Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Kantorczyk v. New Stanton Auto Auction, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
3Cited by5 opinions
- Regency Nissan, Inc. v. JenkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- Hall v. Riverside Lincoln Mercury-Sales, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- McCracken v. Anderson Chevrolet-Olds, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Payne v. Parks Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Regency Nissan Inc v. William H. JenkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1991