Legal Opinion
Borthwick v. Skurzynski
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided January 29, 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Egan, and reported at 139 N. J. Eq. 520.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Colie, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Preund, McLean, JJ. 11.
For reversal — -Heher, Schettino, JJ, 2.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Forbes v. First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Pagano v. United Jersey BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Hinchliffe v. KastnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
- Foster v. ReissSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Hoey v. DellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950