Legal Opinion
James Heddon's Sons v. Callender
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 21, 1939No. 68PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
This is an action to enjoin the defendant from advertising or offering for sale, or selling commodities manufactured by the plaintiff, bearing its trade mark and name, at less than the minimum prices set out in the schedule of prices attached to and a part of the “Fair Trade Retail Sales Contracts” entered into between plaintiff and many retail dealers in the State of Minnesota and elsewhere. The defendant is not a party to any such contract.
An amended complaint has been filed by the plaintiff. A preliminary injunction has been asked by the plaintiff, and the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- KVOS, Inc. v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hunt v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. Cella Commission Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stangard Dickerson Corp. v. United Electrical Radio & MacHine Workers, Local 1218District Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
- Caron Corporation v. Wolf Drug Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
- General Electric Co. v. SabreenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
- Youngs Rubber Corp. v. Dart Drug Corp. of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1959