Legal Opinion

Gallian v. Riemer

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 1945No. Civ. No. 12858PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P.J.

This appeal involves the interpretation of the will of Selma Riemer, deceased, the debatable question being whether the estate devised to her nine-year-old grandson is vested or contingent. This question is presented by the third and fifth paragraphs of the will which read: “THIRD: I hereby give, devise and bequeath to my grandson, Herbert Julius Riemer, my three houses at the Southeast corner of Baker and Union Streets, San Francisco, California when he *635becomes 21 years of age, in the meanwhile his mother Alys Riemer to be his guardian.

“FIFTH: I hereby give, devise and bequeath the rest and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Goebel v. . WolfNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. De Vries v. De VriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Williams v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Estates of YatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Estate of NorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Callnon v. WinrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Estate of JamesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Johnson v. KishelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API