Legal Opinion

Burrell v. Village of Cedarhurst

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1962Published

1Opinion of the CourtFrank A. G-ulotta, J.

This is a defective sidewalk case in which the abutting owner, Rubin, has moved for dismissal of the complaint as to him.

In an effort to hold in the village whose primary duty it is to maintain the sidewalk, but which must receive notice of the defect under section 341-a of the Village Law, plaintiff has alleged that the village created the defect by constructing the walk.

In answer to Rubin’s motion, she now says she has information that the walk was in fact constructed by Rubin’s predecessor in title.

However, it is only in extraordinary cases that when a person buys a title he also buys a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Rochester v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Mullins v. . Siegel-Cooper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Allen v. WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API