Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 7, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Goodhue county, Crosby, J., presiding, refusing a new trial. cited Adams v. Hastings & Dakota R. Co., 18 Minn. 236, (260;) Brown v. Cayuga, etc., R. Co., 12 N. Y. 486; Brakken v. Minn, é St. L. Ry. Co., 29 Minn. 41; s. c., 31 Minn. 45; Carli v. Union Depot Co'., 32 Minn. 101; Hartz v. St. Paul á S. C. R. Co., 21 Minn. 358; Carl v. Sheboygan, etc., R. Go., 46 Wis. 625; Blesch v. Chicago é N. W. Ry.

Read the full summary

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Goodhue county, Crosby, J., presiding, refusing a new trial. cited Adams v. Hastings & Dakota R. Co., 18 Minn. 236, (260;) Brown v. Cayuga, etc., R. Co., 12 N. Y. 486; Brakken v. Minn, é St. L. Ry. Co., 29 Minn. 41; s. c., 31 Minn. 45; Carli v. Union Depot Co'., 32 Minn. 101; Hartz v. St. Paul á S. C. R. Co., 21 Minn. 358; Carl v. Sheboygan, etc., R. Go., 46 Wis. 625; Blesch v. Chicago é N. W. Ry. Co., 43 Wis. 183; Sutherland on Damages, 369 and note.

1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.

The plaintiff’s house and lot are on one side of a street in the city of Bed Wing, the track of defendant on the other side, the surface of the street sloping down from plaintiff’s to defendant’s side. November 1, 1882, the defendant, as plaintiff alleges, wrongfully entered on, and made large excavations in, the street, between her lot and the track, causing the earth in the street to slide into such excavations, and destroying the carriage-way in said street by which she, prior thereto, had access to her premises, rendering them unsafe for occupation, and diminishing their rental value in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brakken v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  2. Karst v. St. Paul, Stillwater & Taylor's Falls RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  3. Brakken v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  4. Brakken v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Worden v. BielenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. Marvin Safe Co. v. EmanuelNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API